On Friday, March 10th, we had the honor to host Professor Sheila Foster, LabGov’s co-founder, co-director of the Fordham Urban Law Center and founder of the Fordham University Urban Consortium, and Professor Maria Rosaria Marella, professor in Private Law at the University of Perugia. Two experts at the international level together to talk about the city as a commons, and about use and property in the urban space as well.
To govern the city as an urban common is the goal for witch we’ve been working for years. Cities are at the same time resources and generative elements so that we can bring by them other several different resources and our duty is to take care of them and to use them as better as we can. How do we create these processes of distribution of resources by the commons to the citizens? What are the limits to the private property and how we decide what’s the right moment to entrust the management of the property to the comunity in order to avoid the “slippage” phenomenon?”.
It is not easy to find answers to these questions but we can notice that the Italian law system tries to solve this problem with a juridic act according to witch is possible to buy properties in collectives without having in return money, but reinvesting it in the society.
Professor Sheila Foster shared with the labgovers her experience on urban commons, defined as something that has to be open, accessible and potentially collectively owned, and talked about the big issue of resource distribution within the city, which leads us to the problem of how do we allocate resources. Professor Foster also shared her knowledge on experiences in New York City (a city that is currently acting as a private land owner) on community-owned networks (broadband) and collaborative ecosystems, that act as incubators fostering common-pooled small business and start-ups, and teach them how to create tech goods, and how to use the commons to pull and distribute resources.
Professor Marella, starting from the assumption of the city as a commons as a place where value and wealth are produced, proposed the legal tools we currently are putting in place to have access to and redistribute resources: the right of access and use, and the limits to the property.
A great moment of discussion and thinking with the students followed the two speeches.
Il 10 marzo, durante il terzo workshop di LabGov EDU 2016/2017, abbiamo avuto l’onore di avere come relatrici dell’incontro la professoressa Sheila Foster, co-fondatrice di LabGov, co-direttore del Fordham Urban Law Center e fondatore del Fordham University Urban Consortium, e la professoressa Maria Rosaria Marella, docente del Dip. di Giurisprudenza presso l’università di Perugia. Due esperti di beni comuni a livello internazionale, insieme per condividere con i labgover la loro esperienza.
La prof.ssa Foster, esperta di governance dei beni comuni urbani intesi sia come risorse in sé sia come elementi generativi, ha condiviso la visione di beni comuni urbani come qualcosa che deve essere aperto, accessibile, e “collectively owned” e parlato di esperienze portate avanti a New York, nello specifico nel Bronx e ad Harlem, concentrandosi sugli ecosistemi collaborativi
Ha poi proseguito la prof.ssa Marella portandoci ad esempio il caso di “salute ambiente e territorio” sul quartiere del Pigneto di Roma per evidenziare i problemi che la proprietà pubblica e privata stanno affrontando negli ultimi anni concernenti i limiti del loro utilizzo e la mancata valorizzazione dei loro benefits.
È emerso che la città è:
- luogo di produzione, di ricchezza e di produzione.
- luogo di espressione.
Una prima riflessione/domanda emersa è stata:
‘’Tutti producono valore, ma come possiamo avere accesso a questa ricchezza? In che misura questa ricchezza può essere distribuita?’’
Giuridicamente non esistono molti riferimenti: tendenzialmente ci sono strumenti che hanno in qualche modo realizzato il diritto di uso agli spazi, e di conseguenza limiti alla proprietà (pubblica e privata). Il caso Pigneto a Roma è molto sentito ed è una situazione molto articolata. Vi è una piccola piazza molto frequentata, gestita dai residenti, in cui organizzano cene e feste particolari. Un giorno una fila di box viene venduta ad un imprenditore che presenta subito un cambio di destinazione di uso per farci una sorta di Starbucks italiano.
Cosa si può fare? C’è un modo per resistere al cambio di utilizzo? In che misura questa comunità ha la possibilità di utilizzare questo spazio e quanto può rivendicarlo?
Si può pensare di evitare la proprietà dando ai singoli utenti l’uso di un’unità in modo che la circolazione dell’immobile nel mercato può essere controllata dalla comunità.
Ci sono già degli esempi di uso comune come i regolamenti (patto tra i cittadini e il comune in cui si stipulano delle regole), immobili assegnati alla comunità con amministrazione favorevole, ad esempio l’ex asilo filangieri (Napoli) (serie di beni diventati accessibili al pubblico).
Nel caso Pigneto questo diritto della cittadinanza non è realizzabile perché non si può rivendicare un bene accessibile – anche se privato – alla comunità.
Ai due speech è seguito un interessante momento di dialogo e confronto con gli studenti.
Appuntamento al 17 e 18 marzo per il primo co-working del secondo semestre!
Verge NYC – Invisibility, a 2.5-day design event organized by students at Parsons School of Design, will take place from the 22nd to the 24th of February 2017.
This year the event will focus on the theme of invisibility, with the idea of highlighting “Invisibility as an opportunity for new strategies to impact our societies” and using “design and trans-disciplinary collaboration as acts of seeing, revealing, and creating new perceptions which investigate invisibility”.
Through panel discussions and conversations the theme of invisibility and of restoring visibility to the unseen will be observed in relation to different issues, ranging from urban regeneration to migration, from inequalities and inclusion to civic engagement, with the aim of confronting complex and transdisciplinary questions such as: “How might we continue to reveal intangible aspects of society and human behaviors? How can we restore visibility to the unseen, unheard communities disenfranchised/displaced by power and politics? In the face of unprecedented social issues emerging from the ongoing refugee crisis how do we highlight contradictions of different inclusion strategies? What aspects are better left invisible?”.
LabGov’s co-founders, Sheila Foster (Fordham University) and Christian Iaione (Luiss University and UniMarconi) will be present at the event, which will bring together leading thinkers, field experts and change-makers with the aim of investigating the invisibility theme. In particular, on Thursday the 23rd from 12.15 to 1.15PM Professor Foster will moderate a panel discussion on “The in/visibility of the urban commons”, which will see the participation of Professor Iaione together with Paola Canavò (Associate Professor of Urban Design at University of Calabria) and Francesco Rossi (Deputy Governor for Urban Planning, Housing, Transport, Calabria Region).
Furthermore, Professor Foster and Iaione will take part in the two-days conversation on “Invisibility in urban commons – envisioning and reclaiming spaces” that will take place in the afternoon of the 23rd and 24th. The conversation, which will be leaded by Cynthia Warner & Lissa Fedrizzi from the University Transdisciplinary Lab, will also involve Eduardo Staszowski, Director at Parsons DESIS Lab. The conversation will stimulate a reflection on the possibility of adopting the “urban commons” framework as a way to create “new social arrangements that enable sharing of (not always visible) spaces, resources, and information among urban denizens, to meet their needs”. The potential of the urban commons and the possible obstacles to their growth will be analyzed through the lenses of un/reclaiming spaces, dynamic and inclusive governance, and alternative economies. Furthermore, the “urban commons” framework will be considered as a possible arrangement to apply in the specific urban case study of the 14th Street in Manhattan, which will be closed to private transit during upcoming repairs to the subway line, offering the opportunity to imagine totally new uses, relationships, and interactions for the street landscape.
The program of the event is available on the website (where it is possible to find the panels and conversations complete list).
A collection of essays on the Commons, edited by Gregorio Arena and Christian Iaione
Air, water, environment, urban spaces, legality: commons. The public debate about these resources neither public nor private is increasingly more alive in Italy. Citizens, above all in this moment of crisis, re-think their way of living together democracy. We are talking about citizens that, in their everyday life, devote time and competences to the entire community and take care of all these collective resources, cooperating to the better quality of life for all. We are talking about active citizens.
The activities of daily commitment of these individuals received new impetus from the Constitutional Reform of the Title V of the Italian Constitution.
The introduction of the principle of horizontal subsidiarity in the Constitutions provides that the Republic “shall promote the autonomous initiatives of citizens, both as individuals and as members of associations, in carrying out activities of general interest, on the basis of the principle of subsidiarity”. Active citizens have not waited over. As highlighted the two editorsin the Introduction of the book: “the explosion of civic energy to support and protect the commons is an important novelty in the Italian scene, at least for the dimension of the phenomenon in the last years. […] However the element of innovation is that during the last years has become a mass phenomenon […]”.
The editors and supporters of the project.
The publication of the book “Italy of the Commons” edited by Gregorio Arena and Christian Iaione aims to testify the development of this innovative process. The volume, edited by Carocci with the contribution of Roma Third Sector Foundation, aims to make an overview of the situation of the commons in Italy. The two editors are respectively, President and Director of Labsus: Laboratory for the subsidiarity. Labsus was born as a magazine online and scientific journal and progressively became a cultural and political point of reference for the thousands of those active citizens and several administrations that are involved daily in the shared care of the commons. From 2006 the creators of the project are committed to spread the idea of the necessity that more citizens become responsible and interested in the matter, following the experience of all those active citizens that longtime are engaged in improving the care and maintenance of an important common good such as their Country.
Moreover Labsus acts as resonance box for experiences of participation: wherever there is a shared garden, an initiative of civic agriculture, the promotion of way of life respectful of the commons or a group of citizens that are organized for adopting and maintaining squares, streets, parks of our cities, in every of these situations Labsus is there to testify.
Labsus is a factory where are experimented new paradigms for life in society. The Book “Italy of the Commons” highlights as a main purpose the activities of study and documentation about the several facets of the term “commons”. For a real understanding of the change taking place in the society it is necessary to clarify the issues of the commons. The dynamics that bring people to cooperate for the protection of the commons must be identified. In particular potentials and implications for the safeguard of these resources from institutions and citizens must be understood.
The various contributions
The essay authored by Carlo Donolo introduces to the concept of common good and to the role of “basis for social life” which it covers. According to Carlo Donolo the commons are hidden everywhere, they are numerous and of different kind: the climate is a natural common good; instead the networks are an artificial common good, finally security is a good that can be found also within private goods such as houses. Trust, knowledge and subsidiarity are commons of which all citizens are provided. From the point of view of the author what is interesting is the possibility to consider the subsidiarity both as an organizational principle and as capabilities-building practices. The subsidiarity allows citizens to discover the role of the commons and the public goods contributing to their propagation. Maurizio Franzini follows a different approach looking at the commons from an economic perspective. The majority of economists do not deal with this subject. The author’s question is about the existence of a solution that on the one hand counteracts the excessive exploitation of common resources, by now a manifest phenomenon, on the other hand allows the common enjoyment without resorting to the privatization. A solution of this question can be found in the creation of institutions and procedures that promote the spread of cooperative behavior in society. Therefore citizens have to cooperate to contribute to the common social and economic wellbeing. To protect the social wellbeing means to care about the maintenance of the welfare State and of democracy itself. Christian Iaione raises meaningful questions about the connection between commons and the quality of life of people: “where does a person go if she lives in a city, […] and feels the need to stay in a natural environment, to do jogging, to read a book on a lawn to breathe clean air? How can this person nourish its will of social relations and meet new people […]? Where this person can cultivate its sense of belonging to a community […]? What are the infrastructure and the services that allow a life worth living […]”. All those questions have always the same answer: the urban spaces and services of common interest. Nowadays these space and services are in crisis. Why? The reasons are the lack of affection of the citizens and the cuts in the budget of local authorities. What is the result? Urban degradation. And what is the solution? Active citizens shall be empowered with the right to manage urban commons. To take care of our cities is in the interest of all citizens because there is an indissoluble nexus between the commons and the achievement of the individual and common wellbeing. The conditions that guarantee the welfare of an urban space have to be preserved and maintained by the citizens. This is the best solution for two reasons: first, local government can rely on the competences and abilities that citizens can offer for the care of the urban commons; secondly, citizens can develop new competences and capabilities by taking care of urban commons. According to Iaione the principle of horizontal subsidiarity has to be considered as the founding stone of a new system of urban welfare. Labsus documents every day a lot of experiences of citizens that activate themselves for defending their city against urban degradation. It looms on the horizons of a new model of administration in which citizens are the main actor together with institutions, of the governance of the commons.
A further approach is given by Giuseppe Cotturri. The Author identifies a link between the citizens’ action for the protection of the commons and the development of the South of Italy. This is a current topic in this time of crisis. Precisely from the crisis and from the need to overcome it Gregorio Arena moves to develop its reflection about community welfare. In Italy there is a strong tradition of solidarity that has its roots in the Social Doctrine of the Church and that manifests itself through the principle of subsidiarity. In the encyclical Caritas in veritate is affirmed that the subsidiarity promoting “«freedom and participation as a means for the assumption of responsibility» encourages the development of free, active, responsible and united persons able to take care of the common good”. This principle could be the way out of the crisis because allows the realizations of an organizational model where the local government is the hub of a network composed by citizens and administrations that share the duty to protect the commons and thereby produce welfare for the entire community.
The reflection developed in this book represent a useful point of departure to continue in the study of this subject that emerges from the social, economic, legal and institutional dynamics. However, the theoretical reflections and the documentations of cases and experiences are not enough. In fact the editors highlight that in order to create a new model of administration it is necessary to begin a cultural action also in schools and institutions. Indeed Labsus is not only theory. With the support of Fondazione Roma Terzo Settore, Labsus started an educational project called “School of civic maintenance of the commons – Rock your school” (www.rockyourschool.org). The pilot project has been made in two high schools of Rome. The concepts and reflections about the commons have come to life in the hands of young and active citizens. Labsus has also been involved in a new project with the Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna and the Municipality of Bologna that consist in the practical experimentation of the techniques of shared administration of the urban commons.